could that rule have been there before and have been deleted? i.e. earlier, entities have been merged with rule x. Rule x is deleted, but the entities still have been merged per that rule. They therefore show up on the report.
------------------------------
Gino Fortunato
Senior Solution Engineer
Reltio
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-23-2025 02:31
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: Match Analyzer shows rule getting matches but Potential matches in tenant excludes that rule
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Hi,
I'm seeing a strange behavior.
Configured a few match rules and rebuilt the match table for them. Then I ran the match analysis job with max count 10000. A rule shows up in the match analysis output indicating 6% of matches whereas the potential matches in the tenant doesn't have that rule at all.
Is it something expected? If yes, could anybody please explain what's going on?
Thanks.