Original Message:
Sent: 6/26/2025 11:40:00 AM
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: RE: How to handle overcollisioned tokens?
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
You're spot on. We removed ignoreInToken and the issue is gone.
Thanks a lot.
Original Message:
Sent: 06-25-2025 12:24
From: Gino Fortunato
Subject: How to handle overcollisioned tokens?
Hi,
I think your problem is the ignoreInToken. See the documentation: https://docs.reltio.com/en/reltio/what-does-reltio-do/what-reltio-does-at-a-glance/data-unification-and-mdm-at-a-glance/data-unification-and-mdm-in-detail/reltio-match-and-merge/match-group-elements---description-and-configuration/rule-element/ignoreintoken.
if it is 'true', then the token is NOT generated. I think you need this to create the uniqueness in the token that would differentiate your matches and prevent the over collision.
------------------------------
Gino Fortunato
Senior Solution Engineer
Reltio
Original Message:
Sent: 06-24-2025 23:00
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: How to handle overcollisioned tokens?
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
Thanks for the reply. We're using DoubleMetaphoneMatchToken & DoubleMetaphoneComparator on first & last name. Also, both the attributes are marked with ignoreInToken=true.
Original Message:
Sent: 06-23-2025 11:57
From: Gino Fortunato
Subject: How to handle overcollisioned tokens?
I think we'd need some more information to help you. What's the tokenezation class for the name attributes? Assuming this has been set up correctly, I don't believe you will get the issue. Can you share that?
------------------------------
Gino Fortunato
Senior Solution Engineer
Reltio
Original Message:
Sent: 06-21-2025 07:59
From: Anonymous Member
Subject: How to handle overcollisioned tokens?
This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
I have a match rule on HCP with fuzzy on first & last name and exact on the address fields. When I run the Reltio match analysis job, it marks some match tokens as overcollisioned with corresponding HCP entity list. What I find is though the first & last names are completely different, these HCPs share a common location. In fact, the location has 300+ HCPs.
Is that what is leading to the token being marked as overcollisioned? How to handle the scenario given I cannot move HCPs out of that address?
Thanks.